User talk:Entrepreneur76
From espians
hey folks - if you have a suggestion to clean up a page that I primarily initiate, please email me your suggested change chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk- eg paste your whole flow and its bookmark - don't do it directly into to the wiki page before July 21- this also has an advantage that at least I know who's looking- hee!
we live in different time zones - I mean backcasting next 5 years not next 14 days; and I send different peers in to look at key bookmarks where at any one time it is vital that the order is one that could influence them to flow most; as for spellings, fine but they are not the most vital temporary thing - I have always practises best use of internet is halfway between reading and writing; one doesnt have time to clean up everything; it is extremely prejudicial to virtual world if you spend more time on its spellos than its conversations whilst operating the revrse bias in real talk worlds
Beyond Bureaucrat a smart wiki for the next 5 years is not the same as a connecting enough wikin for the next 14 days- why dont people get out more big ideas (sketches of what maps we're on about) than be so afraid of form over matter; the english word's linearity is probably the extreme system opposite from showing a good enough trust map to flow through - why dont you spend time on that dilemma instead of burning sushi's costs
click on the red fields, chris...Happyseaurchin 12:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
um... you seem to have a page which is very different... um... do you want me to try to order it a little into the profile template, or not? if not, i won't be able to see what you are up to on eg today's intentions, or a new listing of networks... --Happyseaurchin 16:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC) (aka david pinto)
um... ehhehe... mamading tidied it to the current state... i would like to further tidy it... which i will do, and you can revert it back to mamading's if you want...Happyseaurchin 17:30, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey Chris! It's really awesome that you're adding stuff to this wiki, but could I please request you not to remove the {{cleanup}} tags before a page is actually cleaned up? I can't really understand why you're doing it, especially on pages like Collaborations that are riddled with typos, broken links, bad grammar, and so on. We put in the cleanup template to mark it so that some kind person can come along when they have a bit of time free later on and invest some time into making it more readable. If you take that tag out, then it's much less likely that someone's going to do that. Please respect our local style rules, eh? Or, better yet, invest more care into the articles that you write; note that almost every article that you write has to be tagged with cleanup, so it's sort of becoming a pattern. If something's worth writing, it's worth writing properly, surely!
Many thanks,
--Sbp 09:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
a note on collaboration
There are some pages on the wiki that are essentially mine, since i don't think anyone else will be interested in reading, but it is a place for me to write up my ideas and direct people to it if i so desire... I don't name such pages "Truth" or "Trust" or anything so generic, because i assume other people might want to contribute to such an idea/page. So, please consider the titles of the pages you are interested in creating. If they are for everyone, then, stick some stuff on the content page, and stuff that is more your ideas in the discussion. Otherwise, if the stuff is mainly yours, then design a wikipage name that is kind of personalised.... Does this make sense?
I'd like to contribute to the Trust page, since it might be related to trust maps, etc, and seems pretty central to the whole chebang... but you seem to have monopolised it, and i am not sure how to contribute to it...
--Happyseaurchin 15:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC) the best way -if you have wholly different levels of trust to debates - imo is to add your section at the bottom, and make a contexnts list - trust debate by 1 chris, 2 david
if you dont have wholly different levels, why dont you give an example of what you want to blend in
your synopsis in implying a monoploy is flawed; it is m y assumption that wiki's are built with hypertext and that menas when big words have critical meansings to whether our community can help the world colaborate, we ought to have knowhow pages on those b ig words
sorry! but...
I've had to reset the page for collaborations because it is needed for profile page offshoot so that we can see everyone's collaboration projects rather than just yours say... the information you have put up... i will stick in your More Info section of your profile page...Happyseaurchin 17:17, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
the best way -if you have wholly differen t levels of trust to debates - imo is to add your section at the bottom, and make a contexnts list - trust debate by 1 chris, 2 david
if you dont have wholly different levels, why dont you give an example of what you want to blend in
your synopsis in implying a monoploy is flawed; it is m y assumption that wiki's are built with hypertext and that menas when big words have critical meansings to whether our community can help the world colaborate, we ought to have knowhow pages on those big words
could you stop using phrases like sorry but when you are not at all sorry for changing pages which I spent the nost timne and energy on beginning ; I am delighted to see pages gain in meaning because of co-editing but nobody could call your repeated chnage of the layout of the colaborations page a gain in impact of the content
Impressions
I find that the formatting and organization of content of such pages make them very unparseable to me. It LOOKS like much content, but I can't be bothered parsing it for useful tidbits, let alone as "something to read". As Shailar-in-chief, I would call it "unshailable". Kudos to those that find such content usable, I'm at a loss. --jeffarch 16:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
